Next-gen Xbox to support Steam, Epic, and more - consoles will run on AMD chips

Daniel Sims

Posts: 1,940   +53
Staff
Something to look forward to: Xbox president Sarah Bond has confirmed that Microsoft's next game console will support titles from multiple digital storefronts and maintain backward compatibility. Additionally, a newly announced agreement with AMD suggests that an official Xbox handheld is still in development. All of Microsoft's upcoming consoles (whatever they are) are expected to be AMD powered.

Microsoft's hardware-agnostic video game business model and its responses to Valve's Steam Deck have recently sparked speculation that its next console might fully abandon walled gardens. This announcement from the head of Xbox has confirmed many details from earlier rumors and alleviated concerns about legacy console back catalogs.

In a one-minute video, Bond explains that Microsoft will co-develop processors with AMD for multiple new devices aimed at both living room and handheld use. The companies indicated that the upcoming silicon will feature next-generation graphics and incorporate AI in some capacity.

While Bond didn't specifically mention Steam, she stated that Microsoft is developing a platform that will support multiple stores and devices. Overall, the plan appears to be an evolution of the recently announced Xbox Ally handhelds that run Windows OS.

The upcoming portable devices from Asus replace the traditional Windows desktop with a controller-friendly frontend that incorporates Steam, the Epic Games Store, Game Pass, and Microsoft Store software to create a console-like PC gaming experience. Their lack of backward compatibility with Xbox Series, Xbox One, Xbox 360, and original Xbox titles remains the only missing piece of the puzzle.

The AMD partnership, in itself, isn't surprising – AMD has produced the CPUs and GPUs for every Xbox console since the 360, as well as for the PlayStation 4 and 5. However, Microsoft's announcement confirms that its future devices won't use off-the-shelf AMD chips like the Ryzen AI Z2, which powers the ROG Xbox Ally handhelds.

This may also contradict previous reports that Microsoft had canceled internal plans for an official portable Xbox in favor of supporting existing handheld PCs. If AMD is helping develop multiple custom chipsets, at least one of them could diverge from the Ryzen AI Z family to power a more bespoke, backward-compatible Microsoft handheld system.

AMD is also collaborating with Sony to develop an SoC for the PlayStation 6, based on the upcoming Zen 6 and RDNA architectures. Whether Microsoft will adopt the same architectures remains unclear. According to rumors, Sony, like Microsoft, is planning to release a handheld companion to the PS6.

Permalink to story:

 
This sounds wonderful. An option if you don't want to deal with a gaming PC; totally optional.

Seems like MS is going to keep being the least evil of the 3 with it's no-walled-garden (and pro consumer) approach to gaming.
 
This sounds wonderful. An option if you don't want to deal with a gaming PC; totally optional.

Seems like MS is going to keep being the least evil of the 3 with it's no-walled-garden (and pro consumer) approach to gaming.
Microsoft has proposed, more than once, to turn Windows into a walled garden and lock down gaming to their platforms. Before you go praising them for acting out of sheer desperation.

And for the record, all you would be doing here is buying a gaming PC that you have no control over, so any incompatibility or technical issue, you are totally hosed.

There was already an alternative for those who didnt want to deal with a gaming PC: it is called a game console, and MS's efforts have flopped spectacularly the last 2 gens.
 
Microsoft has proposed, more than once, to turn Windows into a walled garden and lock down gaming to their platforms. Before you go praising them for acting out of sheer desperation.

And for the record, all you would be doing here is buying a gaming PC that you have no control over, so any incompatibility or technical issue, you are totally hosed.

There was already an alternative for those who didnt want to deal with a gaming PC: it is called a game console, and MS's efforts have flopped spectacularly the last 2 gens.
And yet, this generation their actions are the least evil.

And that's a console. So what?

Again, so what?
 
And yet, this generation their actions are the least evil.
UH huh.....this generation, aside from destroying both Forza and halo, shoving obscene micro transactions, and absorbing Activision of all companies, they've also pushed banned people for saying naughty words in CoD, banning your account for typing words like black in Minecraft, and spoke of cross platform bans if you dare cross them in anything. Let's not get into what they've done and are doing with win11.

Leas evil eh? The only reason they are trying to push this more open approach is because they are desperate. Their sales suck. The moment they find success again, they'll go right back to being good ol MS, a company some of us remember for the evil sack of crap they are.
And that's a console. So what?

Again, so what?
So they're making another console. This is not worthy of praise, nor some type of achievement. This is still not a viable gaming PC alternative, it's still an Xbox, which the market doesn't want, and has shown that via sales.
 
This sounds wonderful. An option if you don't want to deal with a gaming PC; totally optional.
It is a gaming pc. Just unmutable, with predefined drivers, on a Windows with modified UI. And all stuff windows brings, like recall and the rest, with unskipable updates and so on. If there will be installed Steam client, it will have to use its own update approach.
 
UH huh.....this generation, aside from destroying both Forza and halo, shoving obscene micro transactions, and absorbing Activision of all companies, they've also pushed banned people for saying naughty words in CoD, banning your account for typing words like black in Minecraft, and spoke of cross platform bans if you dare cross them in anything. Let's not get into what they've done and are doing with win11.

Leas evil eh? The only reason they are trying to push this more open approach is because they are desperate. Their sales suck. The moment they find success again, they'll go right back to being good ol MS, a company some of us remember for the evil sack of crap they are.

So they're making another console. This is not worthy of praise, nor some type of achievement. This is still not a viable gaming PC alternative, it's still an Xbox, which the market doesn't want, and has shown that via sales.
I am only taking issue with Forza and Halo, on PC alone Halo Infinite (Just this title) has 135k daily players, Forza Horizon 5 is rated VERY highly on Steam, with an estimated 27k playing daily on just PC..I don't think they have dropped the ball, is it disappointing to not have a new Halo title yet? Absolutely. Do we know for sure that there is a Halo game in development? Yes.
 
Next generation of XBOX must be totally different.
1.NPU chip for AI.
2. 3D cache memory faster gaming.
3. ZEN6 architecture 2nm.
4. Use UDNA GPU architecture.
Allow multitasking not just gaming console.(Doing office tasks, Video editing, web surfing) that's will post selling due to the facts people can buy one device that can do daily task for theme not just gaming.
5. Normal M.2 storage for easier upgrade.
6. 24gb GDDR7 RAM.
7. Cooperation with Thermalright for better cooling performance.
8. Add ARGB light in case.
 
Lemme guess, all those promises will be bolted onto gamepass somehow?

they're gonna sucker people into a subscription based pc.
 
UH huh.....this generation, aside from destroying both Forza and halo, shoving obscene micro transactions, and absorbing Activision of all companies, they've also pushed banned people for saying naughty words in CoD, banning your account for typing words like black in Minecraft, and spoke of cross platform bans if you dare cross them in anything. Let's not get into what they've done and are doing with win11.

Leas evil eh? The only reason they are trying to push this more open approach is because they are desperate. Their sales suck. The moment they find success again, they'll go right back to being good ol MS, a company some of us remember for the evil sack of crap they are.

So they're making another console. This is not worthy of praise, nor some type of achievement. This is still not a viable gaming PC alternative, it's still an Xbox, which the market doesn't want, and has shown that via sales.
Yeah. Least evil (do you understand what that even implies?). They aren't trying to force their multiple-times-hacked login on SP games. Or restrict regions locks out of spite (only finally silently backing down now). Or double dip with a year+ wait and delivering a buggy mess. Or go out of their way to brick consoles because someone is trying to use it as if they owned it. Or force fans to pay for online just to backup their games (while delivering an objectively worse experience compared to other online services). Or hate on their fans by content striking channels. Or shut down fan events because they aren't "doing it right". Or go out of their way to force a new $80 games industry normal. Or keep their stick-drifting hardware because they know their fans will buy it anyways. Etc.

Edit: And on the flip side, MS is championing no walls, which includes day one launches on 3rd party store(s). An objectively big win for gamers that can't be said at all about the other 2.

So yeah, least evil. And I would rather signal to them that SUPPORTING MORE GAME STORES ON A CONSOLE is a good thing for gaming instead of childishly whining despite them making a positive move.
Hey, you know you're allowed to praise them when they make positive moves (even if they don't always make the best move) right? It's part of being an adult...
Also, I don't care if it's because you think they're desperate. Last I checked MS is still raking it in when it comes to gaming revenue, despite selling a fraction of the hardware. Where are you getting their sales suck?? 😂

And they're making an OPTIONAL open-walled console. Are you so blind and petty that you can't see something OPTIONAL like that as a potentially good thing?? Who cares if it'll be an OPTIONAL managed gaming PC. If they mess it up with the open-walled approach and it fails, that's on them.
You're acting like an Apple fanatic who can't fathom the option of having an OPTIONAL 3rd party store on their Apple device lol
 
Last edited:
It is a gaming pc. Just unmutable, with predefined drivers, on a Windows with modified UI. And all stuff windows brings, like recall and the rest, with unskipable updates and so on. If there will be installed Steam client, it will have to use its own update approach.
That's fine. It's optional and open-walled. Let them try the approach. It doesn't hurt me if the succeed or fail.
But if they succeed, and it finds a market (for those that don't want a traditional console, but also don't want to manage a gaming PC), great! Maybe it'll evolve into something I eventually get for someone in my life where I don't have to manually manage it lol
 
That's fine. It's optional and open-walled. Let them try the approach. It doesn't hurt me if the succeed or fail.
But if they succeed, and it finds a market (for those that don't want a traditional console, but also don't want to manage a gaming PC), great! Maybe it'll evolve into something I eventually get for someone in my life where I don't have to manually manage it lol
I think Steam Deck / Steam OS (Bazzite and generally linux) already is doing that, and is really well tailored for the user needs offering console like experience or a pc layer if you wish.
 
I think Steam Deck / Steam OS (Bazzite and generally linux) already is doing that, and is really well tailored for the user needs offering console like experience or a pc layer if you wish.
Yes and no. Steam Deck is still tailored to handheld (less power for more battery life). This would be stationary (more powerful hardware) I'd assume. Another 1 purchase option.

However, at the least, they can compete. Nothing wrong with a bit of competition.
 
I think it makes lots of sense...

One reason people buy PS is because of exclusives... If you can have a console that can run games from multiple storefronts you can sell more of it... If I could get a console that can run Nintendo/PS/Xbox/Windows games, I would go for it.

And that's not only a win for Microsoft... If Sony can run PS+ on an MS console and sell it's games to Xbox owner, it's also getting the benefits.

Also one thing to consider... The silicon economy is getting a lot worse... Prices are spiking and also the entire PC gaming parts supply chain is becoming more instable with all that conflicts in middle east, asia and so forth... It's easier for MS/Sony to sell a cheaper but "complete" PC gaming solution in one simple package in the shape of a console than to keep on betting on PC gaming...

A gaming console with PC like capabilities, full fledged kb/mouse support, that I can log into my Steam (and other digital storefronts...) library and capable of decent 1440p gaming... I don't need anything else.
 
As I understand from the presentation in this article, I can tell few things.

Windows will be streamlined for handhelds, probably an Xbox type of windows with multiple stores and not tied to one device.

Their hardware will use, of course, same windows, but probably only the handheld will support multiple stores. While the console will only support Xbox store. Unless they plan to make this console pc like and push the Xbox store on every gaming windows.

In my opinion... They should have done this gaming windows long time ago.
Personally I loved to try new demos and know about new titles, but windows store and not being optimised for gaming was not optimum for me, neither windows itself to compel me to use their Xbox stuff.
 
Back